Neighbors Worry About Impact of Glover Park Streetscape Project
Initial stages of construction began April 2 and construction is expected to continue through September.
A plan to widen sidewalks, create a center median and reduce the number of traffic lanes on Wisconsin Avenue in the name of pedestrian safety has set the Glover Park neighborhood listserv "on fire" over the last month. Concerns include traffic, the effect on side streets and a perceived lack of public input.
A meeting on the Glover Park Streetscape project last Tuesday brought out nearly 100 people who wanted answers from District Department of Transportation (DDOT), Office of Planning (OP) and Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) officials.
The project will reduce the number of traffic lanes from three to two during peak hours and from two to one during off-peak hours. Certain intersections will have left turn lanes. A center, painted median will take over the remaining space. The changes will allow for wider sidewalks.
"You're putting forward a plan that we didn't ask for, we weren't told about and we sure as hell don't want it," said Paul Wittrock, a 23-year resident of Glover Park.
Wittrock's frustration was just one example of the overwhelming number of comments raised in lengthy, heated email exchanges lately on the neighborhood listserv. As OP's Andrea Limauro said, the listserv has been "on fire."
But Limauro assured residents that "nothing was hidden" and that the project, which evolved from an OP study in 2006, had continually sought public input through the ANC and Glover Park Citizens Association.
DDOT's Paul Hoffman told the group that traffic modeling was done three times with new data each time to measure the predicted impact of the changes on traffic.
After having two outside groups do traffic modeling, DDOT ran its own study that showed similar outcomes. "We can get traffic through here in orderly fashion with very little degrading of intersections," Hoffman explained.
That "orderly fashion" means cars sit through about half of a light circle before moving. If vehicles sit for longer then there's an issue.
Later Hoffman said DDOT would monitor the volume of traffic along Wisconsin Avenue to determine if traffic is flowing as the agency anticipates.
In addition to Wisconsin Avenue concerns, neighbors were frustrated that DDOT had not taken into great consideration the traffic impacts on 37th Street as drivers look for cut-throughs to avoid Wisconsin Avenue. Several neighborhood mothers said the street was dangerous enough for crossing with a stroller or young children.
Adriana Cordero said she was "disappointed" that the meeting had not addressed more of the community's concerns about 37th Street.
Alberta Paul, the DDOT Community Outreach Specialist (alberta.paul@dc.gov), asked community members to send her their suggestions for improvements and traffic controlling measures along 37th Street.
ANC Commissioner Jackie Blumenthal offered a glimmer of hope for 37th Street residents: reconfiguring the intersection of Tunlaw Road and 37th Street has been moved up as a high priority at DDOT and could possibly become part of the streetscape plan or follow closely on its heels.
During construction, DDOT will have a site dedicated to the Glover Park project, much like they operate for the O&P Street Project. DDOT said officials will contact homeowners about temporary road closures that could block alleys or driveways.
OP's Limauro said their goal for the project was to "reinvent" Wisconsin Avenue and "make it look like what it deserves to be."
For now, construction effects and traffic concerns continue to dominate conversations about the project.
The ANC will address the streetscape project, among other items, at their regular meeting Thursday, April 12 at 7 p.m. at Stoddert Elementary.
NY2GT
1:22 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
Taking away lanes on Wisconsin seems completely insane...can you imagine what traffic is going to be like. They are also taking a lane away on Foxhall after you turn from right from Reservoir Rd. Take about bottle necks...I am surprised there were only 100 people...my gut tells me that this is horrible planning and going to make matters worse.
Shaun Courtney
2:57 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
Well it was election night and spring break week at 7:30, so that might account for some of the size. -SCC
Rodney
3:42 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
The conventional wisdom on how to deal with heavy traffic has changed. It used to be that if you had a situation with too many cars in gridlock, you increase the capacity - add lanes. But it turns out that all that does is bring more cars - increase traffic, make it less friendly to pedestrians and other forms of transport. You end up with loud, ugly, car-filled conduits that divide neighborhoods and destroy the local commerce. At worst, they are parking lots that people hate, and at best they are dangerous raceways that people hate.
The conventional wisdom has shifted to what they are planning with the streetscape. Instead of adding more capacity to help more drivers fit and go faster, you take away lanes - slow them down. You give the capacity to pedestrians and bicyclists and make space for more buses. You calm the auto traffic (slow it down) and put the emphasis on other forms of transport. It gets people out of their cars and encourages them to take advantage of other ways of transport. It makes the neighborhood easier to use, access and encourages community and commerce. It's proven to work and it's a fantastic idea - not insane at all. It's common sense.
That said, they have failed to address how traffic off-Wisconsin should be managed. This happens to happen as part of an overall shift in tactics.
Jacques
2:12 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
This seems pretty reasonable to me, given that the sidewalks are far too narrow for the amount of foot traffic, and the current setup only really provides 1-1/2 lanes in each direction through most of the Glover Park strip (due to double-parked cars and cabs that only pull partway into the wide parking lanes).
Beyond that, Wisconsin drops to 1 lane in each direction (2 at rush hour) once it hits Safeway, so it's not like there's a new bottleneck being created--just moved, if one thinks it's a bottleneck at all.
The most encouraging part of the change is that it could prevent some of the racing-between-traffic-lights that currently exists on this stretch, particularly near the Holy Rood Cemetery/Holiday Inn.
Shaun Courtney
3:01 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
Thanks for your comment, Jacques. Many of the points you make are the goals of the project: pedestrian safety, better sidewalks and preventing reckless driving. The concern that seems to remain is how/if altering Wisconsin Avenue's traffic pattern will impact side streets. DDOT doesn't "anticipate" issues, but also didn't run a study on the current pattern on 37th Street, so it's easy enough to see why those residents are wary.
One thing I did not mention in the article that is worth noting is that the center median is a temporary structure and DDOT has said that even with the larger sidewalks, the road could go back to its normal number of lanes if there are serious issues. The lanes would just be smaller.
Jacques
4:33 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
Shaun, I was primarily responding to NY2GT's comment, which seemed to be focused on the impacts on Wisconsin, not on adding cut-through traffic.
I can see the potential impacts of cut-through on 37th, but unlike 35th or 34th, which run all the way, or almost all the way to the Key Bridge, I think the fact that 37th dead-ends at Reservoir makes it somewhat less likely of a candidate for cut-through traffic. It also has a significant number of 4-way stops, although I wouldn't be opposed to the addition of another stop sign, or perhaps speed-bumps, if those diminished the likelihood of cut-through traffic.
Adriana
11:26 pm on Monday, April 9, 2012
Cut-through or not, medians or not, 2 lanes or 3, the fact remains that 37th and Tunlaw are residential roads that are sorely lacking in safe places for pedestrians to cross. From Calvert to Whitehaven, there is only one pedestrian crosswalk, and it's located at a wildly challenging intersection. Regardless of what goes on Wisconsin, many residents are dismayed that lovely streetlamps on the main drag seem to have received funding priority over pedestrian safety on residential streets.
Megan
12:41 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012
Living in one of the high traffic low safety areas, my concern really is how the cars are driving, not how much space they have to do it. If this new plan slows traffic down while still allowing movement and flow of traffic, it sounds like a great idea. However, it also sounds like a great idea to put in more stop signs and speed bumps in the pedestrian/residential zones to slow cars down. If people are concerned with cars searching for alternate routes, the alternate routes need to be reconstructed along with Wisconsin. There is no need to drive 40+ in a residential zone, a speed bump/stop sign will make this much more difficult to do.
JH
9:15 am on Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Sounds like class warfare. Obama at it again?
marika
4:56 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012
There are too many cars using residential streets that makes it dangerous, and of course, they drive too fast. Squeezing Wisc will make more drivers use residential streets. Adriana & megan, if there were fewer cars then we won't need to worry about crossing the road safely. More crosswalks on a street with 20,000 cars a day will not make it safer because you know many cars don't stop at crosswalks.
Marla
9:56 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
All I know is that the glover park listserv needs to be regulated. There is one guy on there that is personally attacking ANC members and according to my research is not even using his real name. He is awful. Andy Smythe. And there is another crazy woman, MARLA or MARIA LEFTWICH. She is stirring up trouble about signs that were put in years ago. She posted something about capital bikeshare being an EYESORE because it's across the street from her house and she thinks its ugly. She was all "what about the children"?? What about the children, MARIA???
Ahuva
6:12 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
If by regulated you mean censored that's not a good idea. You just personally attacked a couple of people yourself while complaining about them. Why the double standards? I live in Burleith but regularly reads the neighboring listservs. It's shocking that a GP ANC commissioner would make claims about pedestrian deaths to our Georgetown ANC when it's not true. I hope our ANC will do something about that.